130 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
130 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
|
Page migration
|
||
|
--------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page migration allows the moving of the physical location of pages between
|
||
|
nodes in a numa system while the process is running. This means that the
|
||
|
virtual addresses that the process sees do not change. However, the
|
||
|
system rearranges the physical location of those pages.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The main intend of page migration is to reduce the latency of memory access
|
||
|
by moving pages near to the processor where the process accessing that memory
|
||
|
is running.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page migration allows a process to manually relocate the node on which its
|
||
|
pages are located through the MF_MOVE and MF_MOVE_ALL options while setting
|
||
|
a new memory policy. The pages of process can also be relocated
|
||
|
from another process using the sys_migrate_pages() function call. The
|
||
|
migrate_pages function call takes two sets of nodes and moves pages of a
|
||
|
process that are located on the from nodes to the destination nodes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Manual migration is very useful if for example the scheduler has relocated
|
||
|
a process to a processor on a distant node. A batch scheduler or an
|
||
|
administrator may detect the situation and move the pages of the process
|
||
|
nearer to the new processor. At some point in the future we may have
|
||
|
some mechanism in the scheduler that will automatically move the pages.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Larger installations usually partition the system using cpusets into
|
||
|
sections of nodes. Paul Jackson has equipped cpusets with the ability to
|
||
|
move pages when a task is moved to another cpuset. This allows automatic
|
||
|
control over locality of a process. If a task is moved to a new cpuset
|
||
|
then also all its pages are moved with it so that the performance of the
|
||
|
process does not sink dramatically (as is the case today).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page migration allows the preservation of the relative location of pages
|
||
|
within a group of nodes for all migration techniques which will preserve a
|
||
|
particular memory allocation pattern generated even after migrating a
|
||
|
process. This is necessary in order to preserve the memory latencies.
|
||
|
Processes will run with similar performance after migration.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Page migration occurs in several steps. First a high level
|
||
|
description for those trying to use migrate_pages() and then
|
||
|
a low level description of how the low level details work.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A. Use of migrate_pages()
|
||
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Remove pages from the LRU.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Lists of pages to be migrated are generated by scanning over
|
||
|
pages and moving them into lists. This is done by
|
||
|
calling isolate_lru_page() or __isolate_lru_page().
|
||
|
Calling isolate_lru_page increases the references to the page
|
||
|
so that it cannot vanish under us.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Generate a list of newly allocates page to move the contents
|
||
|
of the first list to.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. The migrate_pages() function is called which attempts
|
||
|
to do the migration. It returns the moved pages in the
|
||
|
list specified as the third parameter and the failed
|
||
|
migrations in the fourth parameter. The first parameter
|
||
|
will contain the pages that could still be retried.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. The leftover pages of various types are returned
|
||
|
to the LRU using putback_to_lru_pages() or otherwise
|
||
|
disposed of. The pages will still have the refcount as
|
||
|
increased by isolate_lru_pages()!
|
||
|
|
||
|
B. Operation of migrate_pages()
|
||
|
--------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
migrate_pages does several passes over its list of pages. A page is moved
|
||
|
if all references to a page are removable at the time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Steps:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Lock the page to be migrated
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Insure that writeback is complete.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Make sure that the page has assigned swap cache entry if
|
||
|
it is an anonyous page. The swap cache reference is necessary
|
||
|
to preserve the information contain in the page table maps.
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. Prep the new page that we want to move to. It is locked
|
||
|
and set to not being uptodate so that all accesses to the new
|
||
|
page immediately lock while we are moving references.
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. All the page table references to the page are either dropped (file backed)
|
||
|
or converted to swap references (anonymous pages). This should decrease the
|
||
|
reference count.
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. The radix tree lock is taken
|
||
|
|
||
|
7. The refcount of the page is examined and we back out if references remain
|
||
|
otherwise we know that we are the only one referencing this page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
8. The radix tree is checked and if it does not contain the pointer to this
|
||
|
page then we back out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
9. The mapping is checked. If the mapping is gone then a truncate action may
|
||
|
be in progress and we back out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
10. The new page is prepped with some settings from the old page so that accesses
|
||
|
to the new page will be discovered to have the correct settings.
|
||
|
|
||
|
11. The radix tree is changed to point to the new page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
12. The reference count of the old page is dropped because the reference has now
|
||
|
been removed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
13. The radix tree lock is dropped.
|
||
|
|
||
|
14. The page contents are copied to the new page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
15. The remaining page flags are copied to the new page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
16. The old page flags are cleared to indicate that the page does
|
||
|
not use any information anymore.
|
||
|
|
||
|
17. Queued up writeback on the new page is triggered.
|
||
|
|
||
|
18. If swap pte's were generated for the page then remove them again.
|
||
|
|
||
|
19. The locks are dropped from the old and new page.
|
||
|
|
||
|
20. The new page is moved to the LRU.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Christoph Lameter, December 19, 2005.
|
||
|
|