OpenSDV
/
linux-stable-rt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux-stable-rt/kernel/up.c

21 lines
384 B
C
Raw Normal View History

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-10 04:27:08 +08:00
/*
* Uniprocessor-only support functions. The counterpart to kernel/smp.c
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
int wait)
{
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix Impact: build fix on Alpha kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single': kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/up.c:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/up.c:12: error: for each function it appears in.) The typo didnt show up on x86 because 'cpuid' happens to be a function address as well ... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-11 12:15:21 +08:00
WARN_ON(cpu != 0);
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-10 04:27:08 +08:00
local_irq_disable();
(func)(info);
local_irq_enable();
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix Impact: build fix on Alpha kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single': kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/up.c:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/up.c:12: error: for each function it appears in.) The typo didnt show up on x86 because 'cpuid' happens to be a function address as well ... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-11 12:15:21 +08:00
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-10 04:27:08 +08:00
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);