From 37e7b5f1535dddaace865b25df34a2d049a3a66f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:08:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] cpumask: alloc_cpumask_var() use NUMA_NO_NODE NUMA_NO_NODE and numa_node_id() have different meanings. NUMA_NO_NODE is obviously the recommended fallback. Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- lib/cpumask.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c index 4f6425d77232..af3e5817de98 100644 --- a/lib/cpumask.c +++ b/lib/cpumask.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(zalloc_cpumask_var_node); */ bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags) { - return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, numa_node_id()); + return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_cpumask_var);