Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hugh Dickins ef2b343e99 [POWERPC] Make soft_enabled irqs preempt safe
Rewrite local_get_flags and local_irq_disable to use r13 explicitly,
to avoid the risk that gcc will split get_paca()->soft_enabled into a
sequence unsafe against preemption.  Similar care in local_irq_restore.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-12-04 20:39:20 +11:00
Paul Mackerras d04c56f73c [POWERPC] Lazy interrupt disabling for 64-bit machines
This implements a lazy strategy for disabling interrupts.  This means
that local_irq_disable() et al. just clear the 'interrupts are
enabled' flag in the paca.  If an interrupt comes along, the interrupt
entry code notices that interrupts are supposed to be disabled, and
clears the EE bit in SRR1, clears the 'interrupts are hard-enabled'
flag in the paca, and returns.  This means that interrupts only
actually get disabled in the processor when an interrupt comes along.

When interrupts are enabled by local_irq_enable() et al., the code
sets the interrupts-enabled flag in the paca, and then checks whether
interrupts got hard-disabled.  If so, it also sets the EE bit in the
MSR to hard-enable the interrupts.

This has the potential to improve performance, and also makes it
easier to make a kernel that can boot on iSeries and on other 64-bit
machines, since this lazy-disable strategy is very similar to the
soft-disable strategy that iSeries already uses.

This version renames paca->proc_enabled to paca->soft_enabled, and
changes a couple of soft-disables in the kexec code to hard-disables,
which should fix the crash that Michael Ellerman saw.  This doesn't
yet use a reserved CR field for the soft_enabled and hard_enabled
flags.  This applies on top of Stephen Rothwell's patches to make it
possible to build a combined iSeries/other kernel.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2006-10-16 16:31:36 +10:00
Ingo Molnar c0ad90a32f [PATCH] genirq: add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend()
Add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend() implementations.
(Most architectures had it defined to NOP anyway.)

NOTE: ia64 needs testing. i386 and x86_64 tested.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-29 10:26:23 -07:00
Ingo Molnar d1bef4ed5f [PATCH] genirq: rename desc->handler to desc->chip
This patch-queue improves the generic IRQ layer to be truly generic, by adding
various abstractions and features to it, without impacting existing
functionality.

While the queue can be best described as "fix and improve everything in the
generic IRQ layer that we could think of", and thus it consists of many
smaller features and lots of cleanups, the one feature that stands out most is
the new 'irq chip' abstraction.

The irq-chip abstraction is about describing and coding and IRQ controller
driver by mapping its raw hardware capabilities [and quirks, if needed] in a
straightforward way, without having to think about "IRQ flow"
(level/edge/etc.) type of details.

This stands in contrast with the current 'irq-type' model of genirq
architectures, which 'mixes' raw hardware capabilities with 'flow' details.
The patchset supports both types of irq controller designs at once, and
converts i386 and x86_64 to the new irq-chip design.

As a bonus side-effect of the irq-chip approach, chained interrupt controllers
(master/slave PIC constructs, etc.) are now supported by design as well.

The end result of this patchset intends to be simpler architecture-level code
and more consolidation between architectures.

We reused many bits of code and many concepts from Russell King's ARM IRQ
layer, the merging of which was one of the motivations for this patchset.

This patch:

rename desc->handler to desc->chip.

Originally i did not want to do this, because it's a big patch.  But having
both "desc->handler", "desc->handle_irq" and "action->handler" caused a
large degree of confusion and made the code appear alot less clean than it
truly is.

I have also attempted a dual approach as well by introducing a
desc->chip alias - but that just wasnt robust enough and broke
frequently.

So lets get over with this quickly.  The conversion was done automatically
via scripts and converts all the code in the kernel.

This renaming patch is the first one amongst the patches, so that the
remaining patches can stay flexible and can be merged and split up
without having some big monolithic patch act as a merge barrier.

[akpm@osdl.org: build fix]
[akpm@osdl.org: another build fix]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-29 10:26:21 -07:00
David Woodhouse 62c4f0a2d5 Don't include linux/config.h from anywhere else in include/
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-04-26 12:56:16 +01:00
Stephen Rothwell d4be4f37d9 ppc64: remove ppc_irq_dispatch_handler
Use __do_IRQ instead.  The only difference is that every controller
is now assumed to have an end() routine (only xics_8259 did not).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2005-11-09 16:19:53 +11:00
Paul Mackerras 40ef8cbc6d powerpc: Get 64-bit configs to compile with ARCH=powerpc
This is a bunch of mostly small fixes that are needed to get
ARCH=powerpc to compile for 64-bit.  This adds setup_64.c from
arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c and locks.c from arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-10-10 22:50:37 +10:00
Kumar Gala b671ad2bef [PATCH] powerpc: merged hw_irq.h
Merged hw_irq.h between ppc32 & ppc64.  Added support to use the Book-E
wrtee[i] instructions that allow modifying MSR[EE] atomically.
Additionally, added get_irq_desc() macros to ppc32 to allow mask_irq(),
unmask_irq(), and ack_irq() to be common between ppc32 & ppc64.

Note: because 64-bit Book-E implementations only have a 32-bit MSR the
macro's for Book-E need to come before the PPC64 macro's to ensure the
right thing happends for 64-bit Book-E processors.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-09-22 21:03:34 +10:00