138 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
138 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext
Paravirt_ops on IA64
|
|
====================
|
|
21 May 2008, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
------------
|
|
The aim of this documentation is to help with maintainability and/or to
|
|
encourage people to use paravirt_ops/IA64.
|
|
|
|
paravirt_ops (pv_ops in short) is a way for virtualization support of
|
|
Linux kernel on x86. Several ways for virtualization support were
|
|
proposed, paravirt_ops is the winner.
|
|
On the other hand, now there are also several IA64 virtualization
|
|
technologies like kvm/IA64, xen/IA64 and many other academic IA64
|
|
hypervisors so that it is good to add generic virtualization
|
|
infrastructure on Linux/IA64.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is paravirt_ops?
|
|
---------------------
|
|
It has been developed on x86 as virtualization support via API, not ABI.
|
|
It allows each hypervisor to override operations which are important for
|
|
hypervisors at API level. And it allows a single kernel binary to run on
|
|
all supported execution environments including native machine.
|
|
Essentially paravirt_ops is a set of function pointers which represent
|
|
operations corresponding to low level sensitive instructions and high
|
|
level functionalities in various area. But one significant difference
|
|
from usual function pointer table is that it allows optimization with
|
|
binary patch. It is because some of these operations are very
|
|
performance sensitive and indirect call overhead is not negligible.
|
|
With binary patch, indirect C function call can be transformed into
|
|
direct C function call or in-place execution to eliminate the overhead.
|
|
|
|
Thus, operations of paravirt_ops are classified into three categories.
|
|
- simple indirect call
|
|
These operations correspond to high level functionality so that the
|
|
overhead of indirect call isn't very important.
|
|
|
|
- indirect call which allows optimization with binary patch
|
|
Usually these operations correspond to low level instructions. They
|
|
are called frequently and performance critical. So the overhead is
|
|
very important.
|
|
|
|
- a set of macros for hand written assembly code
|
|
Hand written assembly codes (.S files) also need paravirtualization
|
|
because they include sensitive instructions or some of code paths in
|
|
them are very performance critical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relation to the IA64 machine vector
|
|
---------------------------------------
|
|
Linux/IA64 has the IA64 machine vector functionality which allows the
|
|
kernel to switch implementations (e.g. initialization, ipi, dma api...)
|
|
depending on executing platform.
|
|
We can replace some implementations very easily defining a new machine
|
|
vector. Thus another approach for virtualization support would be
|
|
enhancing the machine vector functionality.
|
|
But paravirt_ops approach was taken because
|
|
- virtualization support needs wider support than machine vector does.
|
|
e.g. low level instruction paravirtualization. It must be
|
|
initialized very early before platform detection.
|
|
|
|
- virtualization support needs more functionality like binary patch.
|
|
Probably the calling overhead might not be very large compared to the
|
|
emulation overhead of virtualization. However in the native case, the
|
|
overhead should be eliminated completely.
|
|
A single kernel binary should run on each environment including native,
|
|
and the overhead of paravirt_ops on native environment should be as
|
|
small as possible.
|
|
|
|
- for full virtualization technology, e.g. KVM/IA64 or
|
|
Xen/IA64 HVM domain, the result would be
|
|
(the emulated platform machine vector. probably dig) + (pv_ops).
|
|
This means that the virtualization support layer should be under
|
|
the machine vector layer.
|
|
|
|
Possibly it might be better to move some function pointers from
|
|
paravirt_ops to machine vector. In fact, Xen domU case utilizes both
|
|
pv_ops and machine vector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IA64 paravirt_ops
|
|
-----------------
|
|
In this section, the concrete paravirt_ops will be discussed.
|
|
Because of the architecture difference between ia64 and x86, the
|
|
resulting set of functions is very different from x86 pv_ops.
|
|
|
|
- C function pointer tables
|
|
They are not very performance critical so that simple C indirect
|
|
function call is acceptable. The following structures are defined at
|
|
this moment. For details see linux/include/asm-ia64/paravirt.h
|
|
- struct pv_info
|
|
This structure describes the execution environment.
|
|
- struct pv_init_ops
|
|
This structure describes the various initialization hooks.
|
|
- struct pv_iosapic_ops
|
|
This structure describes hooks to iosapic operations.
|
|
- struct pv_irq_ops
|
|
This structure describes hooks to irq related operations
|
|
- struct pv_time_op
|
|
This structure describes hooks to steal time accounting.
|
|
|
|
- a set of indirect calls which need optimization
|
|
Currently this class of functions correspond to a subset of IA64
|
|
intrinsics. At this moment the optimization with binary patch isn't
|
|
implemented yet.
|
|
struct pv_cpu_op is defined. For details see
|
|
linux/include/asm-ia64/paravirt_privop.h
|
|
Mostly they correspond to ia64 intrinsics 1-to-1.
|
|
Caveat: Now they are defined as C indirect function pointers, but in
|
|
order to support binary patch optimization, they will be changed
|
|
using GCC extended inline assembly code.
|
|
|
|
- a set of macros for hand written assembly code (.S files)
|
|
For maintenance purpose, the taken approach for .S files is single
|
|
source code and compile multiple times with different macros definitions.
|
|
Each pv_ops instance must define those macros to compile.
|
|
The important thing here is that sensitive, but non-privileged
|
|
instructions must be paravirtualized and that some privileged
|
|
instructions also need paravirtualization for reasonable performance.
|
|
Developers who modify .S files must be aware of that. At this moment
|
|
an easy checker is implemented to detect paravirtualization breakage.
|
|
But it doesn't cover all the cases.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes this set of macros is called pv_cpu_asm_op. But there is no
|
|
corresponding structure in the source code.
|
|
Those macros mostly 1:1 correspond to a subset of privileged
|
|
instructions. See linux/include/asm-ia64/native/inst.h.
|
|
And some functions written in assembly also need to be overrided so
|
|
that each pv_ops instance have to define some macros. Again see
|
|
linux/include/asm-ia64/native/inst.h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those structures must be initialized very early before start_kernel.
|
|
Probably initialized in head.S using multi entry point or some other trick.
|
|
For native case implementation see linux/arch/ia64/kernel/paravirt.c.
|