linux-stable-rt/security
David Howells 896903c2f5 KEYS: call_sbin_request_key() must write lock keyrings before modifying them
call_sbin_request_key() creates a keyring and then attempts to insert a link to
the authorisation key into that keyring, but does so without holding a write
lock on the keyring semaphore.

It will normally get away with this because it hasn't told anyone that the
keyring exists yet.  The new keyring, however, has had its serial number
published, which means it can be accessed directly by that handle.

This was found by a previous patch that adds RCU lockdep checks to the code
that reads the keyring payload pointer, which includes a check that the keyring
semaphore is actually locked.

Without this patch, the following command:

	keyctl request2 user b a @s

will provoke the following lockdep warning is displayed in dmesg:

	===================================================
	[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
	---------------------------------------------------
	security/keys/keyring.c:727 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

	other info that might help us debug this:

	rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
	2 locks held by keyctl/2076:
	 #0:  (key_types_sem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811a5b29>] key_type_lookup+0x1c/0x71
	 #1:  (keyring_serialise_link_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811a6d1e>] __key_link+0x4d/0x3c5

	stack backtrace:
	Pid: 2076, comm: keyctl Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-cachefs #54
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffff81051fdc>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
	 [<ffffffff811a6d1e>] ? __key_link+0x4d/0x3c5
	 [<ffffffff811a6e6f>] __key_link+0x19e/0x3c5
	 [<ffffffff811a5952>] ? __key_instantiate_and_link+0xb1/0xdc
	 [<ffffffff811a59bf>] ? key_instantiate_and_link+0x42/0x5f
	 [<ffffffff811aa0dc>] call_sbin_request_key+0xe7/0x33b
	 [<ffffffff8139376a>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb
	 [<ffffffff811a5952>] ? __key_instantiate_and_link+0xb1/0xdc
	 [<ffffffff811a59bf>] ? key_instantiate_and_link+0x42/0x5f
	 [<ffffffff811aa6fa>] ? request_key_auth_new+0x1c2/0x23c
	 [<ffffffff810aaf15>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x108/0x173
	 [<ffffffff811a9d00>] ? request_key_and_link+0x146/0x300
	 [<ffffffff810ac568>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe1/0x118
	 [<ffffffff811a9e45>] request_key_and_link+0x28b/0x300
	 [<ffffffff811a89ac>] sys_request_key+0xf7/0x14a
	 [<ffffffff81052c0b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
	 [<ffffffff81394fb9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
	 [<ffffffff81001eeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2010-05-05 23:50:24 +10:00
..
integrity/ima include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h 2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
keys KEYS: call_sbin_request_key() must write lock keyrings before modifying them 2010-05-05 23:50:24 +10:00
selinux SELinux: Reduce max avtab size to avoid page allocation failures 2010-04-15 09:26:01 +10:00
smack include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h 2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
tomoyo include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h 2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
Kconfig
Makefile
capability.c
commoncap.c
device_cgroup.c include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h 2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
inode.c security: testing the wrong variable in create_by_name() 2010-04-22 21:17:41 +10:00
lsm_audit.c include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h 2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
min_addr.c
security.c