From 64b5fad526f63e9b56752a7e8e153b99ec0ddecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:41:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] netlabel: use GFP flags from caller instead of GFP_ATOMIC This function takes a GFP flags as a parameter, but they are never used. We don't take a lock in this function so there is no reason to prefer GFP_ATOMIC over the caller's GFP flags. There is only one caller, cipso_v4_map_cat_rng_ntoh(), and it passes GFP_ATOMIC as the GFP flags so this doesn't change how the code works. It's just a cleanup. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c index 2560e7b441c6..7c94aedd0912 100644 --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ int netlbl_secattr_catmap_setrng(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr_catmap *catmap, iter = iter->next; iter_max_spot = iter->startbit + NETLBL_CATMAP_SIZE; } - ret_val = netlbl_secattr_catmap_setbit(iter, spot, GFP_ATOMIC); + ret_val = netlbl_secattr_catmap_setbit(iter, spot, flags); } return ret_val;