From 989f77e3fdee2e8f414dd1da9b6397d8763d414e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:33:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe. Suggested-by: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611083348.20170-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c index 1ba666bcb900..81fbad5e939d 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, } /* - * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be - * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints - * will handle. + * Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing. + * This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum. + * Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum. */ ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX); if (ret) {