From a814613b9a32d9ab9578d9dab396265c826d37f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lan Tianyu Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:49:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq / governor: Remove fossil comment cpufreq_set_policy() has been changed to origin __cpufreq_set_policy() and policy->lock has been converted to rewrite lock by commit 5a01f2. So remove the comment. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c index 03078090b5f7..4dbf1db16aca 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c @@ -38,18 +38,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq) if (!per_cpu(cpu_is_managed, policy->cpu)) goto err; - /* - * We're safe from concurrent calls to ->target() here - * as we hold the userspace_mutex lock. If we were calling - * cpufreq_driver_target, a deadlock situation might occur: - * A: cpufreq_set (lock userspace_mutex) -> - * cpufreq_driver_target(lock policy->lock) - * B: cpufreq_set_policy(lock policy->lock) -> - * __cpufreq_governor -> - * cpufreq_governor_userspace (lock userspace_mutex) - */ ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); - err: mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex); return ret;