The nompu code is now derived from the mpu code, and had the same problem -
no null pointer detection on ICPLBs.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
This is a mixture ofcMichael McTernan's patch and the existing cplb-mpu code.
We ditch the old cplb-nompu implementation, which is a good example of
why a good algorithm in a HLL is preferrable to a bad algorithm written in
assembly. Rather than try to construct a table of all posible CPLBs and
search it, we just create a (smaller) table of memory regions and
their attributes. Some of the data structures are now unified for both
the mpu and nompu cases. A lot of needless complexity in cplbinit.c is
removed.
Further optimizations:
* compile cplbmgr.c with a lot of -ffixed-reg options, and omit saving
these registers on the stack when entering a CPLB exception.
* lose cli/nop/nop/sti sequences for some workarounds - these don't
* make
sense in an exception context
Additional code unification should be possible after this.
[Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>:
- convert CPP if statements to C if statements
- remove redundant statements
- use a do...while loop rather than a for loop to get slightly better
optimization and to avoid gcc "may be used uninitialized" warnings ...
we know that the [id]cplb_nr_bounds variables will never be 0, so this
is OK
- the no-mpu code was the last user of MAX_MEM_SIZE and with that rewritten,
we can punt it
- add some BUG_ON() checks to make sure we dont overflow the small
cplb_bounds array
- add i/d cplb entries for the bootrom because there is functions/data in
there we want to access
- we do not need a NULL trailing entry as any time we access the bounds
arrays, we use the nr_bounds variable
]
Signed-off-by: Michael McTernan <mmcternan@airvana.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Tweak the BUG_ON() check to allow for equal values since the way pos is
handled ... it is always indexed and post incremented
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
change return of close_cplbtab() and fill_cplbtab() to void since we
always return 0 and nowhere do we check this
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Blackfin dual core BF561 processor can support SMP like features.
https://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=linux-kernel:smp-like
In this patch, we provide SMP extend to Blackfin CPLB related code
Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
only if the cplb block overlapped with kernel area, this cplb need be locked
Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
use kernel command line mem and max_mem bootargs to limit
availabe memory instead.
Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
--
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x721a): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_code_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_code_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_code_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x7238): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_code_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_code_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_code_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x7250): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_code_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_code_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_code_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x7264): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_code_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_code_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_code_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x72a2): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_data_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_data_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_data_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x72bc): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_data_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_data_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_data_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x72d4): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_data_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_data_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_data_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x72e8): Section mismatch in reference from the function ___fill_data_cplbtab() to the function .init.text:_fill_cplbtab()
The function ___fill_data_cplbtab() references
the function __init _fill_cplbtab().
This is often because ___fill_data_cplbtab lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of _fill_cplbtab is wrong.
--
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
detect the memory available in the system on the fly by default
rather than forcing people to set this manually in the kconfig
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
relocate MAX_SWITCH_{D,I}_CPLBS from the header to the file
where it actually gets used. this way when we change
CONFIG_MEM_SIZE in our kconfig, we only rebuild one or two files
rather than a whole bunch that implicitly include cplb.h.
this will also remove the ability to clear the swapcount on
the fly, but i really dont think that functionality is important.
ultimate goal is for CONFIG_MEM_SIZE to go away and calculate
this value on the fly based on what u-boot programmed for us.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Bernd Schmidt
Graf Yang
Mike Frysinger
Sonic Zhang
Michael Hennerich
Bryan Wu
Bernd Schmidt