To check for unset node ID for a range memblock_validate_numa_coverage()
was checking for NUMA_NO_NODE, but x86 used MAX_NUMNODES when no node ID
was specified by buggy firmware.
Update memblock to substitute MAX_NUMNODES with NUMA_NO_NODE in
memblock_set_node() and use NUMA_NO_NODE in x86::numa_init().
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFEBAABCgAuFiEEeOVYVaWZL5900a/pOQOGJssO/ZEFAmZq/CsQHHJwcHRAa2Vy
bmVsLm9yZwAKCRA5A4Ymyw79kcpQB/4kmPgJJ0ApdwLT1JiPgLabAPOa05GvCcfa
/1JsoAIX5NlBThy2mX0QJ3963MFkB1wc8KqJuG8OpsL9/AHpdgts+4Me/K2PORWH
cZbgU01S4eqlBIY08mODnSYIpQI+n88kzYob+jRGud/NSwk7wu/+//n6lACqsltE
K+E/9zSfmnnr8gxv6rsi7YTQrXWAsGIhLJDLamYM9Q3Pz0azvdzrfLRlVV4NaaUw
Dvj6wG60A9qAmXP46OTU3DvlVGA5qv4rahLA8JuHC3TIV12/JchENL2yOAj5SMiv
0k/q+89HAcvFm9ByV+auEd1IKjgvNPQYsWaYnB88HZ10oMNkuDD0
=Y/Dv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'fixes-2024-06-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock
Pull memblock fixes from Mike Rapoport:
"Fix validation of NUMA coverage.
memblock_validate_numa_coverage() was checking for a unset node ID
using NUMA_NO_NODE, but x86 used MAX_NUMNODES when no node ID was
specified by buggy firmware.
Update memblock to substitute MAX_NUMNODES with NUMA_NO_NODE in
memblock_set_node() and use NUMA_NO_NODE in x86::numa_init()"
* tag 'fixes-2024-06-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock:
x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node()
memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES
3572597ca8