1dbf58881f
Dominik said: target_freq cannot be below policy->min or above policy->max. If it were, the whole cpufreq subsystem is broken. But (answer): I think the "ondemand" governor can ask for a target frequency that is below policy->min. ... A patch such as below may be needed to sanitize the target frequency requested by "ondemand". The "conservative" governor already has this check: Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> # diff -bur x/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c.orig y/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| cpufreq.c | ||
| cpufreq_conservative.c | ||
| cpufreq_ondemand.c | ||
| cpufreq_performance.c | ||
| cpufreq_powersave.c | ||
| cpufreq_stats.c | ||
| cpufreq_userspace.c | ||
| freq_table.c | ||