Patch from Lennert Buytenhek
The ixp2000 defconfigs are among the few that do not enable module
support by default. I keep enabling module support by hand for every
new kernel version, so let's just make this change upstream.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Richard Purdie
Fix typo in sharpsl_param.c so it works correctly on collie.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Lennert Buytenhek
The IXP2000 has four timers, but if we're on an A-step IXP2800, timer
2 and 3 don't work. We need two timers for timekeeping (one for the
timer interrupt and one for tracking missed jiffies), so on early
IXP2800s we have no other choice but to use timer 1 and 4 for that,
but on all other IXP2000s we'd rather leave timer 4 free since that's
the only timer we can use for the watchdog.
So, on buggy IXP2000s (i.e. the A-step IXP2800) we use timer 4 for
tracking missed jiffies, and on all all non-buggy IXP2000s (i.e.
everything but the A-step IXP2800) we use timer 2.
On a pre-production IXP2800, this patch should print these messages
on boot:
Enabling IXP2800 erratum #25 workaround
Unable to use IXP2000 watchdog due to IXP2800 erratum #25
On any non-buggy IXP2800 (as well as on IXP2400s) you shouldn't see
anything at all, and the watchdog should be usable again.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Catalin Marinas
This patch adds PCI support for the Versatile PB926 platform.
Signed-off-by: Colin King
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Bellido Nicolas
Core support for AAEC-2000 based platforms.
This is an updated version of the previous patch, and takes
into account Russell's comments.
AAED-2000 default configuration will follow as soon
as some problems with the bootloader are sorted out...
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Bellido
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
A fairly recent platform requirement states that the OS must clear the
whole TCE table at setup time, in case firmware left any active
mappings in it. Without this initialization, dynamic bus removes can
fail. Firmware rejects these requests if active mappings still exist
for a slot that has been deallocated by the OS.
Signed-off-by: John Rose <johnrose@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Use the new cpu_has_feature macros instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Some rtasd printks were too loud. They would appear on a quiet boot
even though they were only informational.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
When DMA bounce buffers were unmapped and the data was memcpy'd to
the original buffer, we were not ensuring that the data was written
to RAM. This means that there was the potential for page cache
pages to have different cache states depending whether they've been
bounced or not.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
flush_dcache_page() did nothing for these caches, but since they
suffer from I/D cache coherency issues, we need to ensure that data
is written back to RAM.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
We need to re-initialise the stack pointers for undefined, IRQ
and abort mode handlers whenever we resume.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
When enabled, this should disable UCOPY prequeue'ing altogether,
but it does not due to a missing test.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch changes the type of the third parameter 'length' of the
raw_send_hdrinc() function from 'int' to 'size_t'.
This makes sense since this function is only ever called from one
location, and the value passed as the third parameter in that location is
itself of type size_t, so this makes the recieving functions parameter
type match. Also, inside raw_send_hdrinc() the 'length' variable is
used in comparisons with unsigned values and passed as parameter to
functions expecting unsigned values (it's used in a single comparison with
a signed value, but that one can never actually be negative so the patch
also casts that one to size_t to stop gcc worrying, and it is passed in a
single instance to memcpy_fromiovecend() which expects a signed int, but
as far as I can see that's not a problem since the value of 'length'
shouldn't ever exceed the value of a signed int).
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch changes the type of the local variable 'i' in
raw_probe_proto_opt() from 'int' to 'unsigned int'. The only use of 'i' in
this function is as a counter in a for() loop and subsequent index into
the msg->msg_iov[] array.
Since 'i' is compared in a loop to the unsigned variable msg->msg_iovlen
gcc -W generates this warning :
net/ipv4/raw.c:340: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
Changing 'i' to unsigned silences this warning and is safe since the array
index can never be negative anyway, so unsigned int is the logical type to
use for 'i' and also enables a larger msg_iov[] array (but I don't know if
that will ever matter).
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch gets rid of the following gcc -W warning in net/ipv4/raw.c :
net/ipv4/raw.c:387: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
Since 'len' is of type size_t it is unsigned and can thus never be <0, and
since this is obvious from the function declaration just a few lines above
I think it's ok to remove the pointless check for len<0.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch silences these two gcc -W warnings in net/ipv4/raw.c :
net/ipv4/raw.c:517: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
net/ipv4/raw.c:613: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
It doesn't change the behaviour of the code, simply writes the conditional
expression with plain 'if()' syntax instead of '? :' , but since this
breaks it into sepperate statements gcc no longer complains about having
both a signed and unsigned value in the same conditional expression.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Christoph Hellwig
Eric Sandeen
Nathan Scott
Dean Roehrich
Linus Torvalds
Lennert Buytenhek
Richard Purdie
Catalin Marinas
Bellido Nicolas
Russell King
John Rose
Anton Blanchard
Jeff Garzik
David S. Miller
Jesper Juhl